Thematic ETF launches price brand and politics at a premium
Wedbush's first fund is a 0.75% Nasdaq-100 lookalike; KraneShares bets on humanoids; a four-manager alliance sells deregulation.
Five thematic ETFs in Ultumus's June roundup are competing for the same scarce input—space on advisory shelves where attention is already stretched thin. Two are technology bets, two track the current administration's deregulation agenda, and one is an event-driven hedge-fund strategy that could show up in any sector or region, while their path to assets depends on distribution more than on the underlying ideas.
A 0.75% Nasdaq-100 substitute
Wedbush Funds, an issuer that launched in 2024, is putting its first product behind the analyst known as much for his wardrobe as for his Tesla enthusiasm. The Dan Ives Wedbush AI Revolution ETF (IVES) charges 0.75%, which is 55 basis points above the Invesco QQQ Trust, while eight of its top ten holdings also sit in the Nasdaq 100's top ten—Taiwan Semiconductor and Oracle are the exceptions. If IVES performs in line with the Nasdaq 100, as Ultumus notes is likely, the extra fee buys the brand rather than a different portfolio. That is a marketing fee for celebrity beta, and it is a hard pitch to an advisor who can get the underlying exposure at a fraction of the cost.
Humanoids at 0.79%
KraneShares takes the opposite route with the Global Humanoid and Embodied Intelligence ETF (KOID), and the 0.79% fee is just as rich but the basket is far more distinct. Only Nvidia among its top ten overlaps with the Nasdaq 100's top ten; the rest is a supply chain for humanoid robots that runs from circuit-board maker Jabil and Belgian chipmaker Melexis to Germany's Infineon and Australia's Lynas. The fund tracks the MerQube Global Humanoid and Embodied Intelligence Index, and the bull case leans on Morgan Stanley's Global Humanoid Model, which Ultumus cites as projecting 1 billion humanoids and $5 trillion in annual revenue by 2050. That is a long-dated, speculative target, but at least it offers a differentiated way to own the theme.
Deregulation as a portfolio
The Free Markets ETF (FMKT) is the most explicitly political entry, built around the Trump administration's deregulation agenda that Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent promotes and Elon Musk pursued through the Department of Government Efficiency. Its proprietary analytics point to four US industries—banks holding less capital, healthcare with simpler billing, energy with faster permits, and transport with more flexible labor—and the fund can put up to 5% into Bitcoin and Ether ETPs. The structure is more striking than the thesis: FMKT is a collaboration among SYKON Asset Management, Point Bridge, TRM, and Tidal. Point Bridge is the firm behind the MAGA ETF, so the political identity is by design.
Ultumus's roundup also includes two unnamed funds—one targeting companies headquartered in Texas, the other an event-driven hedge-fund strategy—though the writeup gives neither issuer nor ticker. That completes a lineup running from AI megacaps to deregulation. The humanoid fund is the most original design in the group; FMKT is the most organized for shelf access, and IVES is trying to convert an analyst's following into ETF flows.
The June batch answers the question that followed Nvidia's blowout validation of the AI buildout—which ETF wrapper should own the AI buildout—with fees, celebrity, and politics rather than differentiation. For an advisor, the choices are a 0.75% Nasdaq-100 clone, a 0.79% robot supply-chain fund, a deregulation fund with a four-manager backer, and two unnamed entries. The likely survivors will be the ones with distribution deals already in place, a filtering process that rewards Tidal's platform and Point Bridge's brand more than any portfolio's originality.